Eyre Peninsula farming families face unique challenges with Division 296 superannuation tax on balances over $3 million. This guide explains the new laws, liquidity challenges, and succession strategies, including SMSF restructuring, CGT concessions, and estate planning integration.
The Critical Importance of Farm Succession Planning
For Eyre Peninsula farming families, succession planning represents far more than a business transaction—it’s about preserving generational legacy, protecting decades of wealth building, and ensuring the next generation can continue viable farming operations. The stakes are extraordinarily high, yet formal planning remains alarmingly rare across Australian agriculture.
Approximately 99% of Australia’s 134,000 farm businesses are family-owned and operated, making intergenerational transfer a defining characteristic of the sector. However, only 18% of farming families have a legally binding succession plan, and the consequences are severe: only 30% of family farms successfully transition to the second generation, with a mere 3% surviving beyond the fourth generation.
On the Eyre Peninsula, where agricultural output was valued at approximately $1.43 billion in 2022/23, farming families face unique regional challenges. Variable rainfall ranging from 270mm to 600mm annually, rising input costs, and the trend towards farm consolidation create an environment where succession planning must balance operational viability with family aspirations. The emotional complexity of relinquishing control, combined with financial reliance on the farm for retirement, makes professional guidance essential.
The introduction of Division 296 superannuation tax adds a new layer of complexity for the many Eyre Peninsula families who hold their farm property within Self-Managed Superannuation Funds (SMSFs). Understanding how these new laws interact with succession planning has become critical for protecting intergenerational wealth.
Understanding Division 296: The New $3 Million Superannuation Tax
Division 296 introduces an additional 15% tax on superannuation earnings for individuals with a Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) exceeding $3 million. This effectively doubles the tax rate from 15% to 30% on earnings attributable to the balance above the threshold.
The implementation has been deferred to 1 July 2026, with the first assessments expected in the 2027-2028 financial year after 2026-27 tax returns are lodged. In a significant revision announced in October 2025, the tax will now only apply to realised earnings (interest, dividends, rent, and realised capital gains), removing the controversial taxation of unrealised capital gains that had caused particular concern for farming families.
The calculation methodology works as follows:
- Calculate the proportion of the balance over the threshold: (TSB at end of year – $3 million) / TSB at end of year
- Calculate “Superannuation Earnings” based on the change in TSB from start to end of the financial year, adjusted for contributions and withdrawals
- Calculate Taxable Earnings by multiplying the Superannuation Earnings by the proportion from step 1
- Apply the additional 15% tax to the taxable earnings.
Worked Example: Consider a farming family with a TSB of $4 million on 30 June 2025 and $4.5 million on 30 June 2026, having made concessional contributions of $27,500 during the year.
- Superannuation Earnings: Adjusted TSB = $4.5M – $23,375 (85% of contributions) = $4,476,625. Earnings = $4,476,625 – $4M = $476,625
- Proportion over threshold: ($4.5M – $3M) / $4.5M = 33.33%
- Taxable Earnings: $476,625 × 33.33% = $158,859
- Division 296 Tax Liability: $158,859 × 15% = $23,829
According to Treasury documentation, the government initially estimated this would affect around 80,000 people, or 0.5% of Australians with a superannuation account. However, anecdotal evidence from the National Farmers Federation suggests over 30% of Australian farms may be held in SMSFs, highlighting the disproportionate impact on agricultural families.
Why This Particularly Impacts Eyre Peninsula Farm Families
Eyre Peninsula farming families face unique challenges under Division 296 due to the nature of agricultural assets and regional farming characteristics:
Asset Concentration: Unlike urban professionals with diversified superannuation portfolios, many farming families have their entire superannuation balance concentrated in a single asset—the farm property. When a grain-growing operation near Cummins or a mixed farming property near Yeelanna is valued at $4-6 million and held entirely within an SMSF, the Division 296 threshold is easily exceeded.
Illiquid Assets: Farmland cannot be partially sold like a share portfolio. Eyre Peninsula properties range from small holdings under 100 hectares to large-scale operations exceeding 2,000 hectares. Selling a portion of the farm to generate tax payment funds may not be practical or may compromise operational viability.
Realised Income Taxation: While the removal of unrealised gains taxation provides significant relief, farming families must still manage tax on realised income. Lease income from the farm to the operating entity, along with any actual property sales or other investment returns, will trigger Division 296 tax liability for those over the threshold.
Succession Disruption: The additional tax burden may force families to accelerate or delay succession plans at times that don’t align with the next generation’s readiness or market conditions. The need to generate liquidity for tax payments could disrupt carefully planned intergenerational transfers.
Regional Example: A grain-growing family near Cummins with a $4.5 million farm property in their SMSF generating $90,000 annual lease income would face approximately $4,500 in Division 296 tax annually (assuming the lease income represents the primary earnings). While more manageable than the original unrealised gains proposal, this still represents an ongoing obligation that must be funded from SMSF resources.
The Liquidity Challenge: Where Will the Tax Money Come From?
The Division 296 tax creates a critical cashflow challenge: it’s a personal tax liability, but for SMSF members with illiquid farm assets, generating the funds to pay it requires careful planning.
Individuals can elect to have the tax amount released from their superannuation fund by completing an election form within 60 days of assessment. The ATO then issues a release authority to the nominated fund, which pays the amount directly to the ATO. This option is available even if the member hasn’t met a normal condition of release.
However, the SMSF must have sufficient liquid funds available. For farming families, the options and their implications include:
| Liquidity Option | Pros | Cons | Costs/Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use Lease Income from Farm | Natural ongoing cashflow; no asset disruption | May not be sufficient for large tax bills; reduces funds for other SMSF needs | Must ensure lease is at market rate to avoid NALI provisions |
| Build Cash Reserves | Proactive; provides buffer for multiple years | Requires advance planning; cash earns lower returns | Opportunity cost of holding cash vs. invested assets |
| Sell Liquid SMSF Assets | Preserves farm property; straightforward | Requires SMSF to hold diversified assets; may trigger CGT | CGT at 15% (or 10% if held >12 months) in accumulation phase |
| Sell Farm Equipment/Land Parcels | Generates substantial funds if needed | Disrupts operations; may compromise farm viability; triggers CGT | Transaction costs, CGT, potential impact on business operations |
| Increase Lease Rate to Operating Entity | Increases SMSF income without asset sales | Reduces next generation’s profitability; may not be commercially sustainable | Must remain at arm’s length market rates |
| Personal Payment (Non-Super Funds) | Preserves SMSF balance to continue growing | Requires personal liquidity; may not be available | Opportunity cost of using personal funds |
| Superannuation Withdrawal (if eligible) | Reduces TSB, potentially avoiding future tax; provides personal liquidity | Only available if condition of release met; reduces retirement savings | May have tax implications depending on components and age |
The most sustainable approach typically involves a combination of strategies: maintaining adequate cash reserves within the SMSF, ensuring lease arrangements generate sufficient income, and holding some diversified liquid investments alongside the farm property.
Succession Planning Strategies for Farming Families
Eyre Peninsula farming families have multiple strategies available to manage Division 296 impact while achieving successful intergenerational transfer:
Strategy 1: Review SMSF Asset Allocation
While holding farm property in an SMSF offers significant benefits, including asset protection and concessional tax treatment, families should review whether 100% concentration in a single illiquid asset remains appropriate.
The SMSF Association and ATO have highlighted concerns about funds with over 90% in a single asset. The fund’s investment strategy must explicitly justify why lack of diversification is consistent with members’ retirement objectives and risk tolerance.
Practical steps include gradually building a portfolio of liquid investments (shares, managed funds, bonds) within the SMSF to provide both diversification and liquidity for tax obligations. This doesn’t require selling the farm—it can be achieved through directing new contributions and lease income into diversified investments rather than farm improvements.
Strategy 2: Restructure Farm Ownership
Some families may benefit from holding the farm outside superannuation in alternative structures such as a family trust, company, or partnership. Each structure offers different advantages:
- Family Trust: Flexibility in income distribution, asset protection, succession control
- Company: Limited liability protection, clear ownership structure, easier to transfer shares
- Partnership: Simpler structure, gradual ownership transition possible
However, transferring property out of an SMSF triggers a CGT event. The CGT rate depends on whether the asset is supporting a pension (0% tax) or in accumulation phase (10% if held >12 months, 15% otherwise). Detailed modelling is essential to determine whether the long-term Division 296 savings justify the upfront CGT cost.
Strategy 3: Succession Timeline Acceleration
Bringing forward the transfer to the next generation may allow families to utilise valuable small business CGT concessions before Division 296 creates additional complexity.
The 15-year exemption is particularly powerful: if the farm has been owned for at least 15 years and the owner is 55 or older and retiring, the entire capital gain can be disregarded. The sale proceeds (up to $1.865 million in 2025/26) can be contributed to superannuation without counting towards non-concessional caps.
The 50% active asset reduction reduces the capital gain by 50% after the general CGT discount, effectively reducing the taxable gain by 75%. The retirement exemption allows up to $500,000 per individual to be disregarded.
For a grain-growing family near Cummins with a $4.5 million farm held for 20 years, the 15-year exemption could eliminate the entire CGT liability on transfer to the next generation, preserving hundreds of thousands of dollars that would otherwise be lost to tax.
Strategy 4: Life Insurance in SMSF
Holding appropriate life insurance and Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) cover within the SMSF can provide liquidity for unexpected events. Insurance proceeds can be used to pay Division 296 tax liabilities, fund death benefit payments to non-farming heirs, or provide capital for the next generation to buy out other family members.
Premium funding must be carefully managed to ensure the SMSF maintains sufficient cash flow, but insurance provides a safety net that prevents forced asset sales during difficult circumstances.
Strategy 5: Establish Liquidity Reserve
Proactively building a cash reserve within the SMSF specifically for tax obligations provides certainty and avoids crisis decision-making. A liquidity strategy should be documented in the SMSF investment strategy, outlining target reserve levels and how they will be maintained.
For a family expecting a $5,000-10,000 annual Division 296 tax liability, maintaining a reserve of $30,000-50,000 in cash or highly liquid investments provides a three-to-five-year buffer. This reserve can be invested in term deposits or conservatively managed funds to generate some return while remaining accessible.
Strategy 6: Income Streaming Strategies
Optimising the lease arrangement between the SMSF and the farming operating entity is critical. The lease must be at arm’s length market rates to avoid Non-Arm’s Length Income (NALI) provisions, which would tax the fund’s income at 45%.
However, within market parameters, families can structure lease terms to balance the SMSF’s need for income (to fund tax and pension obligations) with the operating entity’s need for sustainable costs. Professional valuation of market rent for comparable Eyre Peninsula properties provides defensible documentation.
Each of these strategies requires careful implementation with consideration of the family’s specific circumstances, timeline, and goals. Farm accounting specialists with SMSF expertise can provide tailored modelling and guidance.
Integrating Succession Planning with Estate Planning
Farm succession cannot be separated from comprehensive estate planning. The two must work together to protect the family’s wealth and ensure all members are provided for appropriately.
Binding Death Benefit Nominations (BDBNs): Superannuation does not automatically form part of a deceased estate. A BDBN is a legally binding direction to the SMSF trustee on how to distribute death benefits. For farming families, this determines whether the farm (if held in the SMSF) passes directly to the farming heir, is paid to the estate for distribution according to the will, or is split among multiple beneficiaries. Many BDBNs expire every three years and must be renewed.
Family Agreements: Formal, documented agreements prevent disputes and provide clarity. These may include partnership agreements, shareholder agreements, or specific Farm Succession Agreements outlining the transition of management, ownership, and compensation. Buy-sell agreements funded by life insurance can provide a mechanism for farming heirs to purchase the farm from non-farming siblings.
Asset Protection Strategies: Operating the farm through appropriate business structures (companies, trusts) separates business assets from personal assets, protecting the family from business-related liabilities. Testamentary trusts created in wills can protect inherited assets from creditors or matrimonial disputes for the next generation.
Enduring Powers of Attorney: Farming is a high-risk industry, and incapacity can halt business operations. An Enduring Power of Attorney allows a trusted person to make financial and property decisions if the farmer becomes incapacitated, ensuring business continuity without costly court applications.
Eyre Accounting Services works with farming families to integrate succession planning with comprehensive estate planning, coordinating with legal professionals to ensure all elements work together cohesively.
The Role of Professional Advisors in Farm Succession
Successful farm succession requires a coordinated team of professional advisors, each contributing specialised expertise:
- Farm Accountant: Provides tax planning, structure optimisation, financial modelling of succession scenarios, and ongoing compliance. Essential for navigating Division 296 calculations and small business CGT concessions.
- SMSF Specialist: Ensures superannuation compliance, manages SMSF administration, advises on investment strategy requirements, and coordinates Division 296 tax payments.
- Financial Planner: Develops investment strategy, retirement planning for the exiting generation, and wealth accumulation planning for the next generation.
- Solicitor: Prepares legal structures, contracts, wills, powers of attorney, BDBNs, and family agreements. Ensures all documentation is legally enforceable.
- Farm Consultant/Agronomist: Assesses operational viability, advises on business planning, and ensures succession plans support sustainable farming operations.
The importance of coordinated advice cannot be overstated. Decisions made in one area (e.g., transferring property out of an SMSF) have cascading implications for tax, estate planning, and operational structure. Eyre Accounting Services provides comprehensive support through both accounting and financial planning divisions, including partnership with GPS Wealth, ensuring farming families receive integrated advice tailored to their unique circumstances.
Action Steps for Eyre Peninsula Farming Families
Farming families should take the following steps to address Division 296 and succession planning proactively:
- Calculate your current and projected superannuation balance – Include all SMSF assets at current market value and estimate future farm value growth based on regional trends
- Model your potential Division 296 tax liability – Use ATO calculators or work with your accountant to estimate annual tax obligations under different scenarios
- Assess liquidity sources – Identify where tax payment funds will come from: lease income, cash reserves, liquid investments, or other sources
- Review your current ownership structure – Determine whether your farm is held in an SMSF, trust, partnership, company, or personal name, and whether this remains optimal
- Define your succession goals – Clarify when you want to transfer (timeline), to whom (which family members), and how (full transfer or gradual transition)
- Engage your advisory team – Meet with your farm accountant, SMSF specialist, financial planner, and solicitor to develop a coordinated strategy
- Develop a written succession plan – Document all decisions, timelines, contingencies, and responsibilities in a formal plan
- Communicate with the next generation – Ensure shared understanding and agreement on the plan, addressing expectations and concerns openly
- Implement structural changes – Execute any required restructuring, documentation, or asset transfers according to the plan
- Review annually – Farm values, regulations, family circumstances, and market conditions change. Annual reviews ensure the plan remains current and effective
Succession planning takes years, not weeks. Starting early provides time to optimise tax outcomes, build family consensus, and ensure the next generation is prepared for the responsibility.
Case Study: Successful Farm Succession on the Eyre Peninsula
A mixed farming family near Yeelanna with a $4.8 million property (2,400 hectares of cropping and grazing land) held in their SMSF faced significant Division 296 exposure. Both parents (aged 58 and 56) were ready to transition management to their son (aged 32), who had been working on the farm for 10 years. A non-farming daughter (aged 29) worked in Adelaide.
Working with their Port Lincoln accountant, the family developed a comprehensive 7-year succession plan:
Year 1-2: Assessment and Planning
- Obtained independent valuation of the farm property
- Modeled Division 296 tax liability (estimated $6,800 annually)
- Assessed son’s readiness and daughter’s expectations
- Engaged solicitor to draft family agreement and update wills
Year 3-4: Structural Changes
- Diversified 30% of SMSF assets ($1.44 million) into a balanced portfolio of Australian shares and managed funds, providing both liquidity and growth
- Restructured lease arrangement to ensure market rate rent while maintaining son’s operational viability
- Established $40,000 cash reserve within SMSF for tax obligations
- Implemented life insurance to provide $500,000 for daughter’s inheritance, ensuring fairness without requiring farm sale
Year 5-7: Gradual Transfer
- Parents reached age 60 and 58, meeting eligibility for transition to retirement pensions
- Utilized small business CGT concessions (50% active asset reduction and retirement exemption) to transfer farm ownership to son with minimal tax
- Son established operating company to lease farm from parents’ SMSF during transition period
- Parents gradually reduced involvement while maintaining income from SMSF pension
Outcomes Achieved:
- Division 296 tax liability reduced by 30% through diversification
- Sufficient liquidity established to meet ongoing tax obligations without asset sales
- Son successfully transitioned to full management with viable business structure
- Daughter received fair inheritance through life insurance proceeds
- Parents secured comfortable retirement income while preserving family farm
- Total tax savings (CGT and Division 296) estimated at $180,000 over the planning period
This case demonstrates the value of early planning, professional advice, and a coordinated approach integrating tax, superannuation, and family considerations.
Common Mistakes to Avoid in Farm Succession Planning
Eyre Peninsula farming families should be aware of these frequent pitfalls:
- Delaying planning until retirement is imminent – Succession planning requires years to optimise tax outcomes and build family consensus. Last-minute planning severely limits options and increases costs.
- Failing to consider Division 296 impact on SMSF-held farms – Many families established SMSFs years ago without anticipating this tax. Ignoring it now creates future liquidity crises.
- Not having difficult conversations with family early – Avoiding discussions about death, inheritance, and family roles leads to assumptions, misunderstandings, and eventual conflict.
- Ignoring the next generation’s actual wishes and capabilities – Assuming children want to farm without confirming their genuine interest and assessing their readiness leads to failed transitions.
- Focusing only on tax minimisation without considering operational viability – The “best” tax structure may not support a sustainable farming business for the next generation.
- Not documenting agreements formally – Verbal promises and handshake deals are unenforceable and frequently lead to family disputes and litigation.
- Failing to plan for contingencies – Death, disability, divorce, or family breakdown – can derail succession plans. Contingency planning through insurance, powers of attorney, and flexible structures is essential.
- Not seeking specialized farm accounting advice – General accountants may lack expertise in agricultural assets, SMSF rules, and small business CGT concessions specific to farming.
- Treating all children equally rather than fairly – Equal division of assets may not be appropriate when one child is taking on the farm business while others pursue different careers. Fair treatment considers contributions, roles, and circumstances.
- Neglecting to update plans regularly – A succession plan created five years ago may no longer reflect current farm values, family circumstances, or regulatory requirements.
How Eyre Accounting Services Supports Farm Succession Planning
Eyre Accounting Services provides specialised support for Eyre Peninsula farming families navigating succession planning and Division 296 challenges:
- Farm and Agribusiness Accounting: Deep expertise in primary production taxation, including small business CGT concessions, farm business structures, and agricultural asset valuation
- SMSF Specialist Advice: Comprehensive SMSF administration, compliance, and strategic advice, including Division 296 modeling and liquidity planning
- Financial Planning: Through partnership with GPS Wealth, integrated financial planning services covering investment strategy, retirement planning, and wealth accumulation
- Business Structure Optimization: Analysis and implementation of optimal ownership structures for tax efficiency, asset protection, and succession flexibility
- Tax Minimization Strategies: Proactive planning to utilize available concessions and minimize tax burden across generations
- Succession Planning Facilitation: Coordinating the advisory team, facilitating family discussions, and developing comprehensive written succession plans
With a local presence in Port Lincoln and a deep understanding of Eyre Peninsula farming through personal connections to farming families, Eyre Accounting Services combines technical expertise with practical knowledge of regional agricultural challenges. The firm’s integrated approach ensures succession planning addresses not just tax and superannuation but also operational viability, family dynamics, and long-term wealth protection.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: If my farm is worth $5 million and held in my SMSF, how much Division 296 tax will I actually pay?
The Division 296 tax is not calculated on the $5 million value itself, but rather on the earnings attributable to the amount over the $3 million threshold. Here’s how it works:
Your excess balance is $2 million ($5M – $3M threshold). The proportion over the threshold is 40% ($2M / $5M). The tax applies to 40% of your superannuation earnings for the year.
Assuming your SMSF generates an 8% total return (including realised income and capital gains), your total earnings would be $400,000. The taxable earnings would be $400,000 × 40% = $160,000. The Division 296 tax would be $160,000 × 15% = $24,000.
However, under the revised legislation, only realised earnings are taxed. If your farm generates $80,000 in lease income but no asset sales occur, your realised earnings are $80,000. The taxable portion is $80,000 × 40% = $32,000, resulting in a Division 296 tax of $32,000 × 15% = $4,800.
The actual liability depends on your specific earnings each year, including lease income, investment returns from any diversified assets, and any realised capital gains from asset sales. This is why individual modelling is essential. The ATO provides Division 296 guidance, and SMSF specialists can provide precise calculations based on your circumstances.
Q2: Should we take our farm out of our SMSF to avoid the new super tax?
This is a complex decision requiring detailed analysis of multiple factors:
Costs of Transferring Out: Transferring property out of an SMSF triggers a CGT event. If the asset is in the accumulation phase, CGT is payable at 10% (if held >12 months) or 15%. If supporting a pension, the rate is 0%. For a farm with $2 million in unrealised gains, the CGT could be $200,000 in the accumulation phase.
Loss of Tax Advantages: Superannuation provides a concessionally taxed environment (15% on earnings in accumulation, 0% in pension phase). Outside super, investment earnings are taxed at marginal rates (up to 47% including the Medicare Levy). Rental income from the farm would be taxed at personal or company rates rather than the concessional super rates.
Alternative Structures: If transferring out, the farm could be held in a family trust (flexible income distribution), company (limited liability), or partnership (gradual ownership transition). Each has different tax, asset protection, and succession implications.
Succession Timeline: If succession is planned within the next few years and you qualify for small business CGT concessions (particularly the 15-year exemption), keeping the farm in the SMSF and transferring it with minimal or no CGT may be optimal despite Division 296 tax in the interim.
Liquidity Management: If adequate liquidity can be established through diversification, cash reserves, and lease income, paying the Division 296 tax may be more cost-effective than the upfront CGT and loss of concessional tax treatment.
The decision requires modelling specific to your family’s circumstances, including current farm value, unrealised gains, succession timeline, and alternative structure costs. Farm accountants experienced in superannuation can provide detailed scenario analysis to determine the optimal approach.
Q3: What small business CGT concessions are available when transferring a farm to the next generation?
The small business CGT concessions are powerful tools for minimising tax on farm transfers. Four main concessions are available:
1. Small Business 15-Year Exemption: Completely disregards the capital gain if the farm has been owned for at least 15 years and the owner is 55 or older and retiring (or permanently incapacitated). This is the most valuable concession. Sale proceeds up to $1.865 million (2025/26) can be contributed to superannuation without counting toward non-concessional caps.
2. Small Business 50% Active Asset Reduction: Reduces the capital gain by 50% after the general CGT discount. For individuals, this means a 50% general discount followed by a 50% active asset reduction, effectively reducing the taxable gain to 25% of the original gain.
3. Small Business Retirement Exemption: Allows up to $500,000 per individual to be disregarded. Despite the name, retirement is not required, but if under 55, the exempt amount must be contributed to superannuation.
4. Small Business Rollover: Defers the capital gain for at least two years if a replacement active asset is acquired, useful when selling one farm to purchase another.
Eligibility Criteria:
- Active Asset Test: The farm must have been used in a business for at least half the ownership period (or 7.5 years if owned >15 years)
- $6 Million Net Asset Test: The net value of CGT assets owned by you and related entities must not exceed $6 million (excludes family home and superannuation)
- Significant Individual Test: For assets owned by companies or trusts, you must be a significant individual (20%+ ownership) or CGT concession stakeholder
Example: A farming couple (both 60 years old) sell their $4.5 million farm they’ve owned for 25 years to their son. The original cost base was $800,000, so the capital gain is $3.7 million.
- Using the 15-year exemption, the entire $3.7 million gain is disregarded
- CGT liability: $0
- They can each contribute $932,500 to superannuation (total $1.865 million) without it counting towards non-concessional caps
- Tax saving compared to no concessions: approximately $925,000
These concessions are complex and require careful planning to ensure eligibility criteria are met. Timing, ownership structure, and documentation are critical. Qualified agricultural accountants can assess eligibility, optimise the application of multiple concessions, and ensure compliance with all requirements.





